High-Performance Computation for Real-time Structural Health Monitoring

Understanding how high-performance computation (HPC) supports real-time structural health monitoring (SHM) by enhancing data acquisition, signal processing, damage detection, and decision-making.

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) systems are critical for ensuring the safety and reliability of infrastructure. However, the complexity and scale of modern SHM systems demand high-performance computation across various aspects. Here, I outline six key areas where computational resources can significantly enhance SHM capabilities.

Real-Time Data Acquisition and Processing is the foundation of SHM, involving the collection of large volumes of data from dense low-cost sensor networks deployed across structures (Linderman et al., 2011; Rainieri et al., 2011). Sensors such as accelerometers (and other types of sensors) generate high-frequency data streams, often reaching 1000 Hz. High-performance computing (HPC) systems are required to ingest, preprocess, and analyze this data in real time, ensuring the timely detection of anomalies and providing actionable insights during critical events such as high-intensity earthquake events.

Advanced Signal Processing is essential for extracting meaningful structural features such as natural frequencies, damping ratios, interstory-drifts and mode shapes (Yan et al., 2017). Techniques like Fourier Transform, Wavelet Transform, and cross-correlation demand significant computational resources, especially when applied to large-scale datasets or transient events. HPC accelerates these analyses, enabling real-time assessments of structural behavior and enhancing the accuracy of damage detection.

Damage Detection and Localization is one of the most computationally intensive aspects of SHM. Identifying and pinpointing structural damage requires solving inverse problems and applying sophisticated algorithms like mode shape curvature analysis or strain energy methods. Real-time HPC capabilities are critical during extreme events, enabling early detection and localization of damage, which can significantly mitigate risks and inform emergency response.

Finite Element (FE) Model Updating bridges the gap between real-world structural behavior and numerical models, enabling SHM systems to identify subtle changes in structural integrity (Mordini et al., 2007; Fusco et al., 2024). This process involves iteratively updating finite element models to reflect observed data, which requires solving large-scale numerical simulations and optimization problems. For example, the OpenSees (Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation) framework (Brandenberg, 2004) is widely used for simulating the dynamic behavior of complex structures under seismic loading. When integrated into SHM workflows, OpenSees can run real-time simulations to compare measured responses with model predictions, identify discrepancies, and refine model parameters accordingly. However, such iterative simulations are computationally intensive, particularly for large structures or high-fidelity models. High-performance computation accelerates these updates, ensuring timely convergence and improving the accuracy of structural assessments, which is critical for real-time damage detection and risk evaluation.

Machine Learning and Data Analytics play a transformative role in SHM by automating anomaly detection, classification, and prediction tasks. Training deep learning models on high-dimensional data and performing real-time inference for damage assessment require substantial computational power (Sun et al., 2021; Malekloo et al., 2022; Boccagna et al., 2023). HPC systems and GPU acceleration are indispensable for deploying robust, scalable machine learning pipelines that can handle the complexities of SHM data (Entezami et al., 2020).

Visualization and Decision Support enhance the interpretability of SHM results through high-resolution 3D visualizations and real-time dashboards. Rendering complex structural models and integrating live data streams require substantial computational resources. 

Incorporating high-performance computation across these areas will significantly advance SHM systems, enabling real-time monitoring, accurate diagnostics, and efficient decision-making. These capabilities will not only improve the safety and reliability of infrastructure but also optimize maintenance strategies and reduce long-term costs.

Figure: Finite‐element model of the 52‐story building showing the modal shapes (Source: Kohler et al., 2016)

References

Kohler, M. D., Massari, A., Heaton, T. H., Kanamori, H., Hauksson, E., Guy, R., Clayton, R. W., Bunn, J., & Chandy, K. M. (2016). Downtown Los Angeles 52-story high-rise and free-field response to an oil refinery explosion. Earthquake Spectra, 32(3), 1793–1820. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/earthquake-spectra/article-abstract/32/3/1793/585694?casa_token=NQhQSL9107wAAAAA:aWYODKyBXaJeDOVGI7z7IySbRiwK40fojJOpUP4i3o2lF3Ttb1KS7BXfnVcCaivl-O8tUQ
Boccagna, R., Bottini, M., Petracca, M., Amelio, A., & Camata, G. (2023). Unsupervised Deep Learning for Structural Health Monitoring. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7020099
Entezami, A., Sarmadi, H., Behkamal, B., & Mariani, S. (2020). Big data analytics and structural health monitoring: a statistical pattern recognition-based approach. Sensors, 20(8), 2328. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/8/2328
Malekloo, A., Ozer, E., AlHamaydeh, M., & Girolami, M. (2022). Machine learning and structural health monitoring overview with emerging technology and high-dimensional data source highlights. Structural Health Monitoring, 21(4), 1906–1955. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217211036880
Brandenberg, S. (2004). PySimple1gen OpenSees command. http://opensees.berkeley.edu/OpenSees/manuals/documents/PySimple1GenDocumentation.pdf
Fusco, D., Rinaldi, C., Addessi, D., & Gattulli, V. (2024). High-performance beam finite element for predictive response in monitoring existing bridges. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2647(18), 182020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2647/18/182020
Mordini, A., Savov, K., & Wenzel, H. (2007). The Finite Element Model Updating: A Powerful Tool for Structural Health Monitoring. Structural Engineering International, 17(4), 352–358. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686607782359010
Rainieri, C., Fabbrocino, G., & Cosenza, E. (2011). Near real-time tracking of dynamic properties for standalone structural health monitoring systems. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 25(8), 3010–3026. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888327011001646?casa_token=4h9W2c5vAewAAAAA:XE4R1lIRSCMcVu7CgIgLuv_Nd4p5Kc85RLVm5GjPraYdJXwrgrdX6At1OsdAeFZ04pK10rQjcQ
Linderman, L. E., Mechitov, K. A., & Spencer Jr, B. F. (2011). Real-time wireless data acquisition for structural health monitoring and control. Newmark Structural Engineering Laboratory Report Series 029. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/25579
Sun, H., Burton, H. V., & Huang, H. (2021). Machine learning applications for building structural design and performance assessment: State-of-the-art review. Journal of Building Engineering, 33, 101816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101816

Utpal Kumar
Utpal Kumar

Geophysicist | Geodesist | Seismologist | Open-source Developer
I am a geophysicist with a background in computational geophysics, currently working as a postdoctoral researcher at UC Berkeley. My research focuses on seismic data analysis, structural health monitoring, and understanding deep Earth structures. I have had the opportunity to work on diverse projects, from investigating building characteristics using smartphone data to developing 3D models of the Earth's mantle beneath the Yellowstone hotspot.

In addition to my research, I have experience in cloud computing, high-performance computing, and single-board computers, which I have applied in various projects. This includes working with platforms like AWS, GCP, Linode, DigitalOcean, as well as supercomputing environments such as STAMPEDE2, ANVIL, Savio and PERLMUTTER (and CORI). My work involves developing innovative solutions for structural health monitoring and advancing real-time seismic response analysis. I am committed to applying these skills to further research in computational seismology and structural health monitoring.

Articles: 42

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *